Diagram - use of judiciary and public prosecution

-
In order to ensure and maintain his absolute control over the country, Vladimir Plahotniuc uses
  • Moldova judiciary (three levels of instances, including the Supreme Court, plus the Constitutional Court of Moldova); and
  • Moldovan law-enforcing agencies, comprising the Prosecutor General's Office (including the Anticorruption Prosecution), the National Anticorruption Centre and Policc.
The first is to provide court decisions on command, the second - fabricated cases on command, both through his accomplices (heads of the said institutions), as shown in the diagram below.

This is the Plahotniuc's way to plunder public and private property, jail and annihilate the robbed victims and witnesses, persecute and intimidate the opposition and free press, subdue other state institutions, including the Parliament. Plahotniuc himself is the chairman of Democratic (the name is ironical) Party at absolute power in Moldova, usurped by non-democratic and overtly criminal methods.

Once Plahotniuc got full control over the Moldovan judiciary and prosecutor's office, he started to grab public and private properties, meanwhile threatening the victims he robbed with fabricated criminal cases. If they didn't give up fighting for their rights and properties, they got sentenced, jailed or annihilated. It was the Plahotniuc's way of becoming one of the wealthiest men in Eastern Europe.

JUDICIAL SYSTEM Decisions of dispossession (robbery) and subsequent condemnation of the robbed victims PUBLIC PROSECUTORS Decisions of dispossession (robbery) and subsequent condemnation of the robbed victims Superior Coucil of Magistry Supreme Court of Justice Court of Appeal First instance courts Dispossession judgments (the robbery) Command for the fabrication of criminal cases Prosecutor General Anticorruption Prosecutors National Anticorruption Centre Protection of involved judges, their subsequent rewarding Reprisals against the victims and witnesses

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brief Note on Raider Attacks

-
Image
▸ See here the short version Tap to magnify Romania Ukraine Moldova Chisinau Among a striking multitude of appalling violations of human rights in Moldova , there is one which stands out due to its unprecedented magnitude, unparalleled impudence and profound repercussions over the entire country and particularly its banking and insurance sectors. In this Brief Note we introduce the raider attacks of 2010-2011, cases of an utmost social resonance in Moldova. Due to the complicity and personal involvement of the most powerful state dignitaries (heads of Moldovan courts, Prosecutor General, director of Anticorruption Centre, Governor of the National Bank, members of Moldovan Parliament and Govern), nor even the human rights organisations on the spot have dared to address the cases, preferring to turn the blind eye on such an uncomfortable subject only not to annoy the...
Read more

Sanctions against Plahotniuc and grounds for them

-
Image
The EU , US , UK , Canada , Switzerland and Norway added Plahotniuc to their Sanctions lists. Plahotniuc fled Moldova in June 2019. His whereabouts remain unknown. Vladimir Plahotniuc, aka Vlad Ulinici, aka Vladislav Novak Foto: Balkaninsight.com EU Sanctions, 30 May 2023 “ Vladimir Plahotniuc is subject to numerous criminal proceedings in the Republic of Moldova [...] Vladimir Plahotniuc is responsible for actions and implementing policies which undermine and threaten the democracy, the rule of law , stability or security in the Republic of Moldova [...].” NOTE: The EU Regulation mentions 5 of Plahotniuc’s known identities, among which a Russian one, along with his Russian passport no. 0960304018797. ▸  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L:2023:140I:FULL European Parliament Resolution, 19 Apr 2023 “[...] whereas oligarchs Ilan Șor and Vladimi...
Read more

U.S. Department of State 2023 Report on Moldova

-
Image
U.S. Department of State 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices Moldova U.S. Department of State 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Moldova Section E: DENIAL OF FAIR PUBLIC TRIAL While the law provided for an independent judiciary, judicial independence remained a problem due to problems stemming from corruption and selective justice , in which the law was not applied equally to all and was often selectively enforced for politically motivated reasons . Selective justice remained a problem and lawyers complained of instances in which their clients’ rights to a fair trial were denied . ✎ Full report here . See also: the international press on Moldova, a captive state; the raider attacks and their context in Moldova; the list of sanctions against Plahotniuc and grounds for them.
Read more